Surgery was an altogether different experience
![]() |
This is Surgery (general) paper, part 1 |
![]() |
This is orthopaedics paper |
![]() |
And this is Surgery part 2 which was the ultimate cram-test |
When you apply skepticism and care in equal amounts, you get bliss.
![]() |
That’s the question paper, folks. Except the 10 markers, everything was random. |
Finally, after years of apparent toil, the final exam starts. I was cramming yesterday and today morning (exam was from 2-5 pm).
Heart failure was taught by Dr Srinivas in those 7 day extra classes.
Pneumonia, I read today morning. So was NASH and Sjogren’s.
Secondary hypertension, I wrote from what I remembered Dr LakshmeGowda telling when I diagnosed Vinay with hypertension.
Pancytopenia, BMT, Megaloblastic anemia, all the same answers.
Vildagliptins lucky guess as hypoglycemic agent.
Ptosis, thanks to learning opthalmology twice.
Tension headache, I’d no idea, but compared it with cluster and migraine.
Neurogenic Bladder, straight from Dr LakshmeGowda’s mouth from the extra classes.
Scabies – I had remembered the organism that caused it, Zigu telling it while we were having lunch.
ARB, I confused with ACE inhibitors (and wrote Enalapril, etc.), but I’ve drawn the diagram of RAS.
Everything here and there knowledge over the past life translated into black ink.
How many times have you talked about your favorite free software to a friend and they appeared totally convinced about how cool it is, but just won’t stop using their proprietary tool?
Firefox is cool. But Chrome’s market share keeps increasing.
XMPP and IRC are both cool. But they’re both dying.
LibreOffice can do everything you need, but you still look for how to get Microsoft Office for the cheapest price.
Facebook is evil, but you have to post this photo there itself.
Why does this happen? Why is it so hard to make people start using perfectly good, free and open source software for their daily needs?
Why don’t people understand?
To answer it, you should ask yourself why you use any of those FOSS things.
Why do you use Firefox? Because it’s secure, protects your privacy, and puts you in control? No. You use Firefox because you know Mozilla’s mission, and you are passionate about it. Or, because you know how to develop an add-on that changes the colour of the toolbar. Or, because you can do cool things with the in-built Developer tools.
You use Firefox because it’s fun for you to use it.
Why do you use GNU/Linux? Because it’s free software, secure, and puts you in control? No. You use GNU/Linux because you know the economic and social goodness of free software. Or, because you know how to do cool things from the terminal. Or, because you’re one of those people who can actually code the kernel and make it behave the way you want.
You use GNU/Linux because it’s fun for you to use it.
Why do you use encrypted/private channels for communication? Because it protects you from governments? No (unless you’re Edward Snowden). You use encryption because the very idea of having a conversation that nobody can snoop into makes you curious. You use encryption to understand how the whole thing works. You use encryption to prove that it is possible.
You use FOSS because that’s what you do!
You are probably a coder. You already enjoy building FOSS things.
You are probably political. Your philosophy makes you averse towards proprietary.
Think of anything that you use so naturally and you can’t convince a friend to switch to.
Ask yourself why your friend should be using that software.
If the answer is any of “free software”, “secure”, “control”, etc. your friend will never use it.