Blissful Life

Category: patients

  • Public Lives of Doctors?

    Social media has made our private life public. Facebook, Instagram, even WhatsApp (through stories) thrive on users generating engaging content. Often this content is snaps from daily life. A picture is worth a thousand words, yet can be generated in a second. Image centered social media platforms rely on this to keep themselves going.

    What about doctors (and other professionals) on social media? Is it any different for them? Should it be any different?

    This post has been triggered by the #MedBikini hashtag. Here’s one tweet that reveals what happened:

    This journal article considers social media posts where MDs hold alcohol, wear inappropriate attire, and give opinion on controversial social topics as “potentially unprofessional.” How would any of these adversely affect the care we give to patients? 😳 #MedBikini pic.twitter.com/G1iBuqtX8n

    — Ronnie Baticulon (@ronibats) July 24, 2020

    I will not spend a lot of time discussing this particular paper or the twitter response to it. But I will discuss sections from two of the references in this paper.

    A council set up by American Medical Association to address the subject of Professionalism in the Use of Social Media, included this paragraph in their report:

    Though there are some clear-cut lapses in professionalism that can and have been made online by physicians (such as violations of patient privacy or confidentiality, or photos of illegal drug use), there are many more situations that fall into a grey area.  Examples include photographs posted online of an inebriated physician, or sexually suggestive material, or the use of offensive language in a blog.  Any of these actions or behaviors would be considered inappropriate in the hospital, clinic, office, or other setting in which a physician is interacting with patients or other health care professionals in a professional manner.  However, whether physicians must maintain the same standards of conduct in how they present themselves outside the work environment is a more open question.  Physicians certainly have the right to have private lives and relationships in which they can express themselves freely, but they must also be mindful that their patients and the public see them first and foremost as professionals rather than private individuals and view physician conduct through the lens of their expectations about how an esteemed member of the community should behave.  Thus physicians must weigh the potential harms that may arise from presenting anything other than a professional presence on the Internet against the benefits of social interactions online.

    It is this particular paragraph that have been used when creating criteria for “potentially unprofessional” things in papers that followed. One of them has a section like this:

    Within the clearly unprofessional group, binge drinking, sexually suggestive photos, and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act violations were the most commonly found variables. Examples of binge drinking included pictures of residents lining up 5 pints of beer in front of 1 dinner plate, doing “keg stands,”and making comments about being drunk or hungover. Examples of sexually suggestive photos included simulated oral sex, female residents in bikinis with hands pointing to their breasts, and a female resident simulating intercourse with a large cannon. Profanity was also encountered, as was a link to a racist cartoon.

    Within the “potentially unprofessional” group, pictures of residents with alcoholic drinks in their hands were the most frequently encountered. There were also several polarizing political and religious comments made by residents, and 2 instances of residents holding a gun while hunting


    We get a better picture (pun intended) here of what these papers are trying to hint. With that in the background let me talk about a couple of things from my professional life that I’ve thought quite a bit about.

    Alcohol

    Alcohol is a controversial topic among doctors (because many doctors consume alcohol). I do not consume alcohol. I actively dissuade people from consuming alcohol. You could call me anti-alcohol. I have certainly been influenced by Dr Dharav Shah’s campaign against alcohol and his argument for why we should create a negative attitude towards alcohol (the way we have towards smoking) is convincing. And I consider it hypocritical for doctors to be consuming alcohol.

    There are plenty of doctors who disagree. Some of them are of the opinion that social drinking is not a problem at all. They want to draw a line between alcoholism and social drinking and want to allow social drinking without it progressing to alcohol dependence.

    There are some doctors who agree that alcohol is indeed dangerous, but do not agree with the idea that it is hypocritical for doctors to be consuming alcohol while asking their patients to abstain. This is a very important argument.

    One part of the argument is that what doctors, as professionals, give out as advice in a professional setting is not applicable to doctors themselves. That I can talk to my patient about the importance of not eating rice excessively while still eating two full biriyanis a day. That professionals need not hold themselves to the standard that they’re prescribing for their clients.

    The other part of the argument is that what doctors do in their private lives should not be dictated by their profession. Superficially it makes sense. But does it stand scrutiny?

    Firstly, does private life stay private? As we noted in the case of social media above, the notion of a private life that is wholly disconnected from public life is Utopian. What happens when something a doctor does in their private life becomes public?

    Secondly, would you apply that logic when what the doctor does in their private life is something that you find morally reprehensible? Say the doctor in their private life engages in adultery, directing pornography, or working for BJP’s IT cell (not that I find all of these morally reprehensible). Would you be comfortable saying “it is their private life?”

    This leads to the other thing that I am constantly thinking about.

    The impression that a doctor “should” make

    How should a doctor appear in front of their patients?

    The trouble starts from the first day of medical school. There is a certain way you’re expected to be dressing. There is a “smart” appearance dictated by the higher-ups in the hierarchy which usually included (for me) shaved face, short hair well combed, clean new aprons, polished shoes, and so on.

    It goes deeper. In “Be the Doctor Each Patient Needs“, Hans Duvefelt tells this:

    “Doctors are performers, not only when we perform procedures, but also when we deliver a diagnosis or some guidance.”


    The point Dr Duvefelt makes is about the therapeutic effect of a doctor-patient relationship. As a doctor, you need your patient to believe in you and in turn your advice. I talked about how this complicates everything about the doctor-patient relationship in my post about consultation fees.

    The gist of the matter is that doctors might have to do things (like shaving their naturally growing beard) to appeal to the completely irrational gut-sense of their patients. Weird argument, right? I don’t like it either.

    I don’t like it that I have to feign confidence in what I’m saying even when the field of medicine is not 100% sure about anything. I don’t like it that the biases that patients make up based on the impression I leave influence their adherence to the treatment regimen I prescribe. But these are how humans think and act.

    This is exactly why people dress well for an interview. Why politicians are careful about how they’re being photographed. Why celebrities have a link with fashion. And why people put their degrees on their Twitter and LinkedIn handle.

    I hate this world.

    Unprofessional

    Last day a patient messaged me. On SMS and on Telegram. My telegram bio includes pictures of me from a long time back and also a link to my telegram channel where I post links to my own blog posts. For some reason I responded to the patient on SMS although it was easier to talk on Telegram. I am not sure what to think about it. But at that moment I was not feeling comfortable with using Telegram to talk to a patient. The reason is that I blog mostly about technology. And multiple times in the past have people assumed I know very little medicine when they find out how much I know about technology. I don’t want my patients to read my blogs.

    That brings us back to professionalism. Professionalism is defined by society’s sense of morality. And that is where bikini pictures appear potentially unprofessional and sexually suggestive images appear clearly unprofessional to some. The #MedBikini hashtag is either about stating that private lives of doctors should not matter to patients or about the idea that bikinis are not immoral, or both.

    I think the entire post has been devoted to the point about whether we should worry about what patients think about us or not.

    The morality of underwear pictures is something that deserves a detailed debate. I end with the following question. Are sexually suggestive images unprofessional? Why?

  • Patient Inclusiveness in Rounds, Sex Between Serodiscordant Couples, Role-plays, PrEP, PEP, Anti-Retroviral Drugs, Drug Resistance, and what not!

    This weekend was fun! I am grateful to a lot of people for it being so.

    It started Saturday morning with grand rounds, as usual. We were joined by Dr Ramakrishna Prasad (RK), Dr Ashoojit, and Dr Praneeth Sai. RK was leading the rounds. And he introduced the concept of patient/family centred rounds wherein we include the family in the discussion and make them feel a part of the process.

    That meant I talked to the patient in front of everyone and let him describe his problems in his own words. This allowed gleaning certain facts of his life that were also much useful later in the day while talking about other aspects of care in HIV.

    What followed was journal club by Dr Swathi in the training hall. She presented “Living with the difference: the impact of serodiscordance on the affective and sexual life of HIV/aids patients” a topic that greatly interests her.

    They interviewed 11 carriers and based on the theme of sexuality after HIV infection between serodiscordant couples found four topics articulated:

    1. Fear of Sexual Transmission to the Partner
    2. Sexual Response Alterations
    3. Sexual Abstinence
    4. Sexual Life Maintenance.

    Based on this experience, there was a role-play session where Dr Praneeth volunteered as an HIV positive patient and I as his spouse and Dr Swathi would counsel us about our sexual life.

    That’s when the groundbreaking reality of U=U was introduced by RK. Apparently, studies like HTPN 052 has shown that when the viral load is undetectable as a result of ART, the virus is untransmittable! This must bring great joy to serodiscordant couples who have been having poor sex life after diagnosis.

    With that in mind, the role-play went ahead in letting the couples know the latest science and choose what they like to do going ahead – abstinence, safe sex, or unprotected sex. (Of course keeping in mind that other STIs can get transmitted through unprotected sex).

    Then we spent about an hour discussing on thesis topics that we would want to work on for our fellowship using frameworks like the logic model and SMART criteria.

    I had fancied the concept of using technology (phone alarm) to improve adherence to ART. Based on that initial concept our discussion took us to a mixed method study on the pattern of adherence, associated demographics, need for adherence support, and factors for poor adherence because we thought there is no answer to these questions in our setting. [I can imagine myself interviewing patients admitted in the ward probably due to an opportunistic infection they got as a result of poor adherence leading to poor immunity, trying to draw themes on the reasons why they don’t take medication; and also probably finding correlation between parameters and good adherence]

    Next, Dr Swathi finalized that her study would be on the topic of sexual life of serodiscordant couples. She would find out the fears these couples have. She would also take the latest science (U=U) and collect reactions.

    Dr Praneeth would be working on PrEP and PEP, how counselling improves the rates of PEP or PrEP, their effectiveness, and so on.

    We all agreed on a rough timeline – two months for proposal and ethics clearance. Two months for data collection. Two months for thesis writing. And then we had lunch.

    The initial schedule for the evening was theory classes by RK on various topics which he morphed a bit into Feynman technique of learning. We were asked to take up a topic and explain using the white board. And whenever we hit a roadblock he would come up with answers/questions that would help us understand the topic or the lacunae in our knowledge. (One of the many inspiring techniques RK would demonstrate in these two days).

    Swathi went on with acute HIV. How does acute HIV look like? Can we diagnose HIV based on symptoms? How soon can we diagnose it? What is the natural history of HIV like? (The graphs we had to come up with showing CD4 count and viral load over time in HIV, merit a post of their own)

    Then I had to talk about anti-retroviral medications. I tried to draw the lifecycle and then explain where the various drugs acted at. And then, while trying to give examples for each class, did I realize that I knew very few ARVs. TLE, ZLN, over. There seems to be a world much beyond just these.

    On demand PrEP vs Daily PrEP. This was what Dr Praneeth talked about. He’s been behind PrEP and PEP for a while as evident from his research interest. While I had no idea about Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), let alone the different modes of administration. Anyhow, here’s an article that says on-demand PrEP is as effective as daily PrEP.

    Next, Dr Ananth introduced PRIME theory of motivation in the context of smoking cessation and we did a little role-play on a smoker and doctor counselling them to quit.

    Sunday morning Dr Ashoojit and Dr Praneeth joined rounds and we listened to the stories of two patients – one who had their son living separately for the fear of catching the disease, and the other who had the story of TB but just not the evidence

    Then we had a test.

    1. Sita, 26 y/o F, from HD Kote, presents to SVYM after she finds out she is pregnant (LMP 4 months back). Married 6 years back. Husband: Construction worker. Her HIV ELISA returns as REACTIVE
      How will you approach her care?
      – Key history & examination
      – Investigations
      – Counseling messages
      – Therapeutic interventions
      – Health promotion/disease prevention
      (3 marks for each point)
    2. Her husband, Ravi, is 31 y/o M. Further questioning reveals that he is known HIV Positive, but never told Sita. He says he got it from an older married woman he was sexually active with in the past. He was diagnosed at age 28. Reason for testing: Wt loss (10 kg) (Wt at diagnosis 54 kg), oral thrush. Initial CD4 count: 76. Treated with TLE. Denies alcohol use, reports never missing his doses. <A graph with CD4 count showing improvement in the first year of treatment, till 154, then falling back to 38 by 3rd year. Corresponding fall and rise in weight>
      – Develop a problem list (2 marks)
      – Choose 1 clinical hypothesis that is most likely to explain the clinical picture (2 marks)
      – What investigations would you like to send for? What results do you expect to find? (6 marks)
      – Given your knowledge of the husband’s case details, will you manage Sita’s care differently? (5 marks)
    Here’s the much more beautifully laid out original

    We wrote answers to these questions in half an hour and self evaluated. A discussion ensued on what each person missed, and what each person wrote. This was fun as well as thought-provoking.

    And then, Dr Varsha took the fastest and most interesting 15 minutes of the whole weekend to talk about genetic mutations and drug resistance in HIV.

    Screengrab of the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance DB

    She was evidently excited about the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database and talked about 3 mutations that she wanted us to read about – M184V, K65R, K103N. Her explanation of what protease does, and how NRTIs and NNRTIs act opened my eyes to a whole new world of possibilities.

    There is more to write about each things I have mentioned here. Maybe another day. Do reach out to me if you’re impatient.

  • CPR – To Terminate Or Not To – That is the Question

    Unlike with many other resolutions I figured out that today is the first day of the month only after resolving to be productive today. As a part of that I woke up about an hour early and started seeing my babies in ground floor general ward. (Oh, did I forget to mention, I’m in charge of Paediatric patients since more than a couple of weeks now).

    But I hadn’t even figured out why Atenolol was prescribed to the child with hepatorenal syndrome and not so high BP when I was informed that I had to cover general OPD in Kenchanahalli hospital today. As I had the experience of missing the van going there for being a minute late last time, I didn’t take risk and ran away after instructing the nurse to withhold Atenolol.

    It was only when I was halfway over the bridge that connects our hospital to the other side of Saragur that I realized that the Atenolol was not for BP, but to control the heart rate – tachycardia and gallop rhythm. I told the consultant paediatrician about how dumb I had been and he said it also helps in relieving portal hypertension which our child had.

    Anyhow, Kenchanahalli is a nice break from the hectic Saragur hospital. Serene, silent, and sleepy. I could spend up to half an hour talking with each patient and understanding their problems.

    It takes only half an hour of talking and a spot capillary glucose reading of 352 to make a grandmother who has been visiting our hospital for as long as I have been alive to confess that she has not been taking the teneligliptin 20 mg tablet for the past one month (along with the glipizide + metformin combination, pioglitazone, enalapril, hydrochlorthiazide, metoprolol, and ecospirin) because our hospital didn’t have it in stock the last time she came (one month ago).

    It takes only half an hour of talking about various reasons to quit smoking, instant and late benefits of quitting smoking, complications of continuing smoking, showing images from Google images of healthy lungs and smoker’s lungs and talking to his daughter and her husband about how they can help to convince a 60 year old who had come with a bidi (which was momentarily destroyed and thrown into dust bin in line with the practice inherited from our consultant physician), a match box in his shirt pocket (which was involuntarily donated to the canteen) and amoxycillin tablets in trouser pockets to quit smoking.

    It takes only half an hour of history taking, examination, and consultation over phone (and whatsapp) with consultant to convince a family (and myself) that their newborn who was vomiting milk through mouth and nostrils and not opening her eyes like she was in shock half an hour before, but opened her eyes and mouth and started crying the moment the ambulance reached hospital, is stable and okay and to learn that Epstein Pearls are nothing to worry about. Another 15 minutes ought to be spent to check on the mother who had Tetrology of Fallot and CCF, to listen to her heart murmurs and the wonderful story of how she had to undergo emergency LSCS because she was a short primi, the adventure they experienced in going to Jayadeva hospital to be declared fit for surgery, and how much money they had to pay to the workers who pushed the trolleys or handed over the just born child to the family waiting outside. All that and I was about to send them home with just a home remedy of preparing saline water and pouring a couple of drops into each nostril as many times as possible to relieve the nasal blockage (because we had ran out of saline nasal drops) and luckily I remembered I could prescribe Vitamin D3 drops for babies or I would have sent them back empty handed.

    Medicine is exceedingly fun (and sometimes horribly sad) when you can spend more time with the patient (and family) than what is required to just figure out the diagnosis. Realizations like these are easy to come by when you walk through the now empty corridors of Kenchanahalli hospital where the soul of people behind SVYM always remains.

    But I did not have time to revel in such thoughts. As a part of being not resolute, I had been postponing the task of drafting a CPR protocol for our hospital. I had to finish it somehow. But wherever I search, I couldn’t find a definite answer to the question of when to terminate resuscitation (or efforts at resuscitation). AHA who is the authority on CPR leaves it at that multiple variables should be taken into account. An Indian CPR guideline didn’t even acknowledge this question exists. Someone in Japan had done an analysis based on survival rates and figured out the factors that coincided with prolonged survival or vice versa and set an algorithm for termination. With no definite answer, I resorted to the diplomacy that everyone seems to be following. My protocol draft says that the team leader should make a decision based on a list of variables and that they should continue CPR if they can’t make a decision (in the hope that something changes to make the decision easier, or help comes in the form of a senior doctor who can then take the decision).

    While returning to Saragur in the Maruti Omni ambulance (this car model is so versatile I want to buy one and set up a mobile clinic in the Himalayas later in my life) I was looking at all the clouds with golden lining because the Orange sun was setting behind them and thinking that I should definitely resume the habit of journaling.

    And my children were all fine except one of them is at the lowest point of Dengue thrombocytopenia and looks so sick he could fall down and disappear if someone didn’t hold him up. And the guy whom I withheld Atenolol for? Seems like there is no way to figure out his exact BP. He is too long for a child so we might be tempted to not use the Paediatric BP cuff, but his arms are so thin that an adult cuff would go twice or thrice around his arm. Not to mention that there are two kinds of machines – the adult one with mercury and the Paediatric one with aneroid technology. Mix them up and you get 4 combinations. And we were getting different values for each of these configurations. Finally, I decided to assume that his BP was not too low because he could sit up without giddiness and I could feel the dorsalis pedis artery inside his grossly swollen foot.

    The decision to terminate CPR or not might not make a huge difference in many cases, the patient would die anyhow with the sorry state of our health facilities and infrastructure. But a doctor is forced to be iron minded and make tough decisions every day. Wish them great luck.